In the second part of Dying
in the City of the Blues: Sickle Cell Anemia and the Politics of Race and
Health, Keith Wailoo details the events that caused the attention around
sickle cell anemia to rise to the national level, beginning in the 1950s. Wailoo
emphasizes the importance of World War II for the United States and how the healthcare
industry, as well as race relations, changed in the post-war era; “[t]he
involvement of African Americans in the war effort produced a new discourse on
race and health, a discourse that was tinged with disturbing questions about
inequality, democracy, and citizenship.”[1]
How, then, did the innovations in the healthcare industry and the return of
African Americans from the war change spark an increased interest in sickle
cell disease at the national level? From this section of the book, it is
evident that the changing race relations, as the country was on the eve of the
Civil Rights movement, and a new focus on the lives of African Americans factored
into the increased interest and research in sickle cell disease.
As World War II ended
and African American veterans began returning home, the fear of a rise in racial
tensions spread throughout the country, particularly in the South; many Southerners
feared that African Americans would want better treatment, especially in
healthcare, because of the equality they experienced in the army. This fear
came to fruition as a new African American middle class emerged following the
war. As Wailoo states, “[i]f whites could ignore the existence of blacks in
earlier decades, they could not do so after the war.”[2]
With African Americans demanding greater equality, events that led to the Civil
Rights movement also played a role in the visibility of sickle cell disease in
the country.
One
such example was Brown v. The Board of
Education in 1954, which banned segregated public schools in the United
States. Focusing on the psychological effects of segregation on African American
children, the media became more interested in the lives of African American
children; “[i[f black children were still peripheral to these mainstream health
concerns, the push for racial equality and school integration would make them
increasingly visible in the 1950s. The rising social awareness of sickle cell
disease reflected a convergence of racial politics and a new disease economy.”[3]
With an increased interest in the welfare of black children, the steady rise of
the Civil Rights movement in the South, and an increased focus on family
healthcare, it is seen that these different factors contributed to sickle cell
disease being discussed and researched at the national level.
[1] in Keith Wailoo’s Dying in the City of the Blues: Sickle Cell
Anemia and the Politics of Race and Health (Chapel Hill: The University of
North Carolina Press, 2001), 86.
[2] Aubrey Bowsen, “Superstition and
Syphilis,” review of Roark Bradford’s This
Side of Jordan (London: Harper and Brothers, 1929) in New Amsterdam News, March 1929, in [L.S. Alexander] Gumby Collection of the American Negro, Scrapbooks (New
York: Columbia University Libraries, 1971-74), in Keith Wailoo’s Dying in the City of the Blues: Sickle Cell
Anemia and the Politics of Race and Health (Chapel Hill: The University of
North Carolina Press, 2001), 96.
No comments:
Post a Comment