Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Response to Freund: Race, health and medicine


When Freund calls a race “a biological fiction” he is referencing the myth of race and the living monster it has created among society. Race is something that was constructed to create a division, yet as a “biological fiction” it carries possibly the most power in politics, economic, and culture in society from hundreds of years ago to present. This social and political assumption is generated through the ongoing behaviors and motives of certain individuals in society. Haney-Lopez defines “race” as “a vast group of people loosely bound together by historically contingent, socially significant elements of their morphology and/or ancestry…. Race is neither an essence nor an illusion, but rather an ongoing, contradictory, self-reinforcing process subject to the macro forces of social and political struggle and the micro effects of daily decisions.”[1] Extending from this, his claim concerning race carrying political, economic, and cultural power holds true on a specific subject of issues of health and medicine.
 For example, in the executive summary from Missing Persons: Minorities in the Health Professions, “minorities make up less than 10 percent of baccalaureate nursing faculties, 8.6 percent of dental school faculties, and only 4.2 percent of medical school faculties. Viewed in the context of demographic projections showing that no racial or ethnic group will comprise a majority by the year 2050, that decline could be catastrophic.”[2] Their vision and goal, as they worked with information from Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, which explains the importance of diversity:diversity allows more people from different backgrounds to look at the same problem and to explore different approaches and different solutions”[3].
Furthermore, the readings provide proof of discrimination in the health-care industry. A study conducted in 2000 which was based on actual clinical encounters proved that race is brought into account when evaluating a patient: “doctors rated black patients as less intelligent, less educated, more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, more likely to fail to comply with medical advice, more likely to lack social support, and less likely to participate in cardiac rehabilitation than white patients, even after patients’ income, education, and personality characteristics were taken into account.”[4] This unequal treatment has occurred for decades well after the Civil Rights era. Given this, numerous questions are raised; why haven’t we taken the necessary steps and followed the advice given in both the Missing Persons and Unequal Treatment reports?; as a nation, why are we so complacent in creating a more equal and unified society?; and lastly, is it possible that racism is more alive and prevalent in today’s society in comparison to the time around the Civil Rights era?


[1] Haney-Lopez, Ian F. "Social Construction of Race: Some Observations on Illusion, Fabrication, and Choice." Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository, no. 1 (1994): 12.
[2] Sullivan, Louis W. "MISSING PERSONS: MINORITIES IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS." The Sullivan Commission, September 20, 2004.
[3] Sullivan, Louis W. "MISSING PERSONS: MINORITIES IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS." The Sullivan Commission, September 20, 2004.
[4] Smedley, Brian D., Adirenne Y. Smith, and Alan R. Nelson. "Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care." THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS: 11. Institute of Medicine.


No comments:

Post a Comment